X
The Wilderness Debate Rages On: Continuing the
The Wilderness Debate Rages On: Continuing the
The Wilderness Debate Rages On: Continuing the
The Wilderness Debate Rages On: Continuing the

The Wilderness Debate Rages On: Continuing the Great New Wilderness Debate

Product ID : 29356913


Galleon Product ID 29356913
Shipping Weight 1.73 lbs
I think this is wrong?
Model
Manufacturer University Of Georgia Press
Shipping Dimension 9.25 x 6.3 x 2.17 inches
I think this is wrong?
-
4,411

*Price and Stocks may change without prior notice
*Packaging of actual item may differ from photo shown
  • Electrical items MAY be 110 volts.
  • 7 Day Return Policy
  • All products are genuine and original
  • Cash On Delivery/Cash Upon Pickup Available

Pay with

About The Wilderness Debate Rages On: Continuing The

Ten years ago, The Great New Wilderness Debate began a cross-disciplinary conversation about the varied constructions of "wilderness" and the controversies that surround them. The Wilderness Debate Rages On will reinvigorate that conversation and usher in a second decade of debate. Like its predecessor, the book gathers both critiques and defenses of the idea of wilderness from a wide variety of perspectives and voices. The Wilderness Debate Rages On includes the best explorations of the concept of the concept of wilderness from the past decade, underappreciated essays from the early twentieth century that offer an alternative vision of the concept and importance of wilderness, and writings meant to clarify or help us rethink the concept of wilderness. Narrative writers such as Wendell Berry, Scott Russell Sanders, Marilynne Robinson, Kathleen Dean Moore, and Lynn Maria Laitala are also given a voice in order to show how the wilderness debate is expanding outside the academy. The writers represented in the anthology include ecologists, environmental philosophers, conservation biologists, cultural geographers, and environmental activists. The book begins with little-known papers by early twentieth-century ecologists advocating the preservation of natural areas for scientific study, not, as did Thoreau, Muir, and the early Leopold, for purposes of outdoor recreation. The editors argue that had these writers influenced the eventual development of federal wilderness policy, our national wilderness system would better serve contemporary conservation priorities for representative ecosystems and biodiversity.