X
Category:
Chemistry
America's Newton: The Reception of the Work of
America's Newton: The Reception of the Work of
America's Newton: The Reception of the Work of

America's Newton: The Reception of the Work of Randell Mills, in Historical and Contemporary Context

Product ID : 48379586


Galleon Product ID 48379586
Shipping Weight 1.2 lbs
I think this is wrong?
Model
Manufacturer
Shipping Dimension 8.9 x 5.98 x 0.79 inches
I think this is wrong?
-
1,086

*Price and Stocks may change without prior notice
*Packaging of actual item may differ from photo shown
  • Electrical items MAY be 110 volts.
  • 7 Day Return Policy
  • All products are genuine and original
  • Cash On Delivery/Cash Upon Pickup Available

Pay with

About America's Newton: The Reception Of The Work Of

This book gives an answer, insofar as I knew it by 2008, to a question: why hasn't the work of Randell Mills and his company, BlackLight Power (later renamed Brilliant Light Power), had a friendlier reception? The short answer: Mills rejected the incumbent foundational theory of physics (Schrödinger-based Quantum Mechanics, or SQM), which can explain only 5% of everything out there, and replaced it with a new foundational theory, called the Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics. (The GUTCP, now a three-volume work of over 1800 pages, is available on Amazon and also available as a free PDF download from the website of Mills' company.) Alas, journal editors, scientists, graduate students, science writers, science managers, venture capitalists, the funding agencies, Congress, and the attentive public are still taught to hold SQM in awe. America's Newton is extensively documented for those who would like to read more about any of the topics mentioned. Erratum: on p. 228, I gave the wrong values for the minimum and maximum sizes of Mills’ oscillatory universe. Readers will no doubt find other mistakes. Much has happened since 2008, and Mills has made great progress towards commercialization of the nonpolluting carbon-free energy source that the world needs more than ever. But the most basic fact in science remains the same: the incumbent foundational theory of the physical sciences is still unable to explain 95% of all that exists.